[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21d7e9970907142143y5e289ffdld0cfd73ef0106953@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:43:38 +1000
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Tiago Vignatti <tiago.vignatti@...ia.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vga: implements VGA arbitration on Linux
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Alan Cox<alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> +#ifndef __ARCH_HAS_VGA_ENABLE_RESOURCES
>> +static inline void vga_enable_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> + unsigned int rsrc)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_bus *bus;
>> + struct pci_dev *bridge;
>> + u16 cmd;
>> +
>> +#ifdef DEBUG
>> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s\n", __func__);
>> +#endif
>> + pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, &cmd);
>> + if (rsrc & (VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_IO | VGA_RSRC_NORMAL_IO))
>> + cmd |= PCI_COMMAND_IO;
>> + if (rsrc & (VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_MEM | VGA_RSRC_NORMAL_MEM))
>> + cmd |= PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY;
>> + pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
>
> Locking question - what locks this lot against hotplug also touching
> bridge settings ?
>
>> +
>> + if (!(rsrc & VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_MASK))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + bus = pdev->bus;
>> + while (bus) {
>> + bridge = bus->self;
>> + if (bridge) {
>> + pci_read_config_word(bridge, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL,
>> + &cmd);
>> + if (!(cmd & PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_VGA)) {
>> + cmd |= PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_VGA;
>> + pci_write_config_word(bridge,
>> + PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL,
>> + cmd);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + bus = bus->parent;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
>
>> + /* The one who calls us should check for this, but lets be sure... */
>> + if (pdev == NULL)
>> + pdev = vga_default_device();
>
> What if the BIOS provided device was hot unplugged ?
>
>> + conflict = __vga_tryget(vgadev, rsrc);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vga_lock, flags);
>> + if (conflict == NULL)
>> + break;
>> +
>> +
>> + /* We have a conflict, we wait until somebody kicks the
>> + * work queue. Currently we have one work queue that we
>
> If two drivers own half the resources and both are waiting for the rest
> what handles the deadlock
I'm not sure we should care about resource locking granularity below,
I have all resources, I have no resources, I don't think we gain anything
by it, since really we want to avoid using vga arb as much as we can.
Tiago, the other issue I noticed when using this is we need to provide
a hook for drm drivers that use an irq to have the irq disabled around
the mem/io space disables otherwise they can get an irq with no mem/io
and boom all fall down.
Old X userspace RAC never worried about interrupts and assumed the
GPU wasn't using one which was true in the 80s.
Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists