linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.6.4.rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A5ECC09.3010405@garzik.org>
Date:	Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:43:21 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>
CC:	git@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.6.4.rc1

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> writes:
> 
>> Is there some sort of guide to the new best practices for handling
>> trees such as git.kernel.org, where one pushes into "foo.git"
>> directly, and there is no checked-out source code at all?
> 
> I think old repositories will be helped if you add
> 
> 	[core]
>         	bare
> 
> to their foo.git/config files.

Thanks.  What about cloning new repositories?  Real world example:

Local workstation has /spare/repo/cld/.git repository, with checked-out 
working tree.

I want to publish this tree to the world via a *.kernel.org-like system, 
so my task is to

	scp -r /spare/repo/cld/.git remote.example.com:/pub/scm/cld.git

but if I do this with scp, then future pushes to 
remote.example.com:/pub/scm/cld.git emit the warning about updating the 
currently checked-out branch -- even though there are no checked-out 
files.  The checked-out files were not copied in the scp.

Regards,

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/