[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247738062.15471.96.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:54:22 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/11] kernel:lockdep:replace DFS with BFS
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 15:12 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> 2009/7/16 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>:
> >
> > I've asked several times to comment on the removal of that generation
> > count DaveM did. Is that a normal part of DFS, or was that an
> > optimization on top particular to this problem, can something similar be
> > done for BFS, etc.
>
> DFS uses generation count DaveM did to decide if a class is visted, and BFS
> uses bitmap to mark a class is visted or not and the extra efficiency loss is
>
> bitmap_zero(bfs_accessed, MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES);
>
> before staring each BFS.
>
> On most of ARCH, bimap_zero can be optimizied to only consume very few
> instructions,
> can't it?
>
> It seems bitmap is more easily used in BFS than generation count.
Ah, I so missed that, sorry about that.
I'll go over the patches one more time and push them out.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists