[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247779226.3062.44.camel@dyn531421.br.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:20:26 -0300
From: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andy Isaacson <adi@...are.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, adi@...apodia.org,
dds@...gle.com, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Shahbaz Khan <shaz.linux@...il.com>, seiji.munetoh@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TPM: DATA_EXPECT bit check bypass
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 16:08 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:43:32 -0300, Rajiv Andrade said:
>
> > @@ -582,6 +585,12 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, resource_siz
> e_t start,
> > tpm_get_timeouts(chip);
> > tpm_continue_selftest(chip);
> >
> > + for (i=0; i < 8; i++)
> > + if (ITPM_ID[i] != to_pnp_dev(dev)->id->id[i])
> > + break;
> > + if (i == 8)
> > + chip->is_itpm = 1;
> > +
>
> strcmp() variant of some sort instead?
Wait, is to_pnp_dev(dev)->id->id[i] null terminated? Maybe memcmp() fits
better here..
Rajiv
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists