[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200907162327.25700.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:27:25 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add "VmUsers: N" to /proc/$PID/status
On Thursday 16 July 2009 21:46, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:22:18 +0200, Denys Vlasenko said:
>
> > It can be nice to know how many such CLONE_VM'ed processes
> > share VM with given /proc/PID. Then it would be possible to do
> > more accurate accounting of memory usage. Say, by dividing
> > all memory usage numbers of this process by this number.
>
> Process A clones a process A1. Process B clones a process B1. Now
> all 4 of them have 'VmUsers: 2' on them, but there's no clean way to tell
> whether A1 or B1 is the one sharing with A, or with B.
>
> The patch is probably sufficient if all you want is some N to divide by, but
> not if you care *which* processes are sharing how much.
You are right. There is more: the truly accurate accounting
needs to be per page. Like /proc/$PID/smaps
and /proc/$PID/pagemap. (However, I am not sure you can
relize that two processes share a VM by looking
at these files either)
I do not aim to solve _that_ problem with my patch.
I, indeed, want to have just an N I can divide RSS/VSZ/etc by,
to get, say, top display which do not mislead user
into thinking that he has 3 processes with 100 megabyte RSS
when in reality he has 3 processes sharing a single VM
with 100 meg RSS.
This will still not be completely accurate due to per-page
sharing and such, but it will be more accurate
than what we have now.
--
vda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists