[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aec7e5c30907170719re0b4152y987d30f8cdeb0cba@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 23:19:22 +0900
From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: Ian Molton <ian@...menth.co.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>,
Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>
Subject: Re: MMC: Make the configuration memory resource optional
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Guennadi
Liakhovetski<g.liakhovetski@....de> wrote:
> Add support for tmio_mmc hardware configurations, that lack the cnf io
> area, like SuperH SoCs. With this patch such hardware can pass a single
> ctl io area with the platform data.
Right, this need looks familiar. =)
Have you tested this on any specific platform?
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
> CC: Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>
> ---
> Pierre, I know you wanted to step down as a MMC maintainer (thanks for
> your great work btw!), but since we don't have a new one yet, I'm CC-ing
> you.
>
> A version of this patch has previously been submitted by Magnus Damm
> (CCed), but it hasn't been accepted back at 2.6.29 times (about 4 months
> ago). Now this driver extension has become much simpler, so, I think,
> there should be no problem accepting this patch now.
Yes, this patch looks a bit simpler than what I posted earlier. Nice work.
I remember posting a series of patches for the tmio_mmc driver, but
only the fixes were accepted at that point. Is this patch all that is
needed to get tmio_mmc working on your platform, or are you planning
on posting some other patches as well?
Cheers,
/ magnus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists