[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090717162001.GC5878@count0.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:20:01 -0700
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>, stable@...nel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen
tasks really
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 05:55:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 08:51 -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
>
> > So it's not clear to me how adding PF_FREEZING fixes anything. Am I
> > missing something?
>
> Yep, PF_FROZEN is only observed going into schedule(), on the way back
> out thaw_process() will already have cleared the flag.
>
> So we don't increment in deactivate_task(), but we do decrement in
> activate_task(), yielding for some very unbalanced accounting.
Ahhh, right!
OK, so the fix looks good then.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists