linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/20] ceph: debugging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090717215114.GC6173@basil.fritz.box>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jul 2009 23:51:14 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/20] ceph: debugging

> Is that really a concern when compiling with DEBUG or 
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG? 

I would expect that CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=1 is moving
into distribution/production kernels. It simply
makes a lot of debugging much easier. For you
later that would be also useful, if you have 
a user report about some misbehaviour and you
need more debug output it is much
easier to tell them to enable flag X than to 
recompile.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/