linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Restructure BSS linker script macros.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:13:36 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>
Cc:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Anders Kaseorg <andersk@...lice.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restructure BSS linker script macros.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 06:58:50PM -0400, Tim Abbott wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Tim Abbott wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 06:23:33PM -0400, Tim Abbott wrote:
> > > > I'd like acks from Sam and David on this one.  Also CCing Paul, since
> > > > he has a patch from me which will need to be updated to use
> > > > BSS_SECTION(0, PAGE_SIZE, 4) once this gets merged.
> [...]
> > > Could you please resend including the necessary fix for mn10300 so we do not
> > > break bisecting.
> > 
> > I don't understand what you're asking here.  The original patch I sent 
> > does include the necessary fix for mn10300 in the first hunk (reproduced 
> > below).  I intentionally changed the mn10300 use at the same time as 
> > changing the macros in order to avoid breaking bisecting.
> 
> I realized that you probably meant that I should resend the sh patch that 
> I have currently in linux-next via Paul's tree that is broken by this 
> change.
> 
> Paul -- the patch below differs from the version have in two ways:
> (1) I updated it to use the fixed BSS linker script macros from this 
> thread.
> (2) I dropped the hunk that conflicted with a similar change in the percpu 
> tree[2], as the version of that change in the percpu tree is better.

I do not expect Tejun's work to be included until next merge window.
It would be nice if we could queue up a lot of vmlinux.lds
cleanup patches so they are ready for next merge window.
But we should rely on the arch maintainers mostly - as you nicely
have done for sh here.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/