[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247794620.26272.213.camel@rzhang-dt>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:37:00 +0800
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] device async action mechanism
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 21:45 +0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> >> the kernel device suspend time is reduced from 3.2s to 2.8s after
> >> applying this patch set in my test box.
> >
> > It will give even a bigger boot time saving on ThinkPads, where there is a
> > Synaptics (or ALPS if you are unlucky) touchpad with the trackpoint behind
> > it... it takes about 2s to init both devices here. That's two seconds of
> > boot time you can shove off if it is being initialized assyncronously :-)
> >
>
> that's a different problem that I don't think this will solve;
right.
we are not able to get an async device group during initialization.
thanks,
rui
> as long
> as you keep the boot of the kernel wait for all async actions, you're going
> to hit that wait. In Moblin we have a (bad) patch to not do the wait,
> at some point we need to figure how to get a mainline-able patch....
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists