[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090716213106.32d61d53@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:31:06 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-acpi" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
"Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] introduce the device async action mechanism
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:11:59 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> Well, first, I'm not really sure that using the async _boot_
> infrastructure for that is a good choice.
the async function call mechanism is for more than boot.
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists