| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <43e72e890907171815x3a85c788k1b4c0f72954db9e5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:15:40 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Ted Merrill <atheros@...uildsw.com> Subject: khttpd fate I was reviewing khttpd [1] history [2], and the last I see is it was merged for the 2.4 kernel with enthusiasm. I don't see any information about this for 2.6 though, nor can I find any other notes about why this was removed. Just curious if someone recalls why it was removed. Also, I really hate how trolly this questions sounds but here it goes anyway: Such userspace-kernel hacks shouldn't be necessary anymore based on 'performance/latency' arguments right? I take it khttpd wasn't serious but more of a hack for fun and now we should be able to laugh about it? [1] http://www.fenrus.demon.nl/ [2] http://lwn.net/2001/0118/kernel.php3 Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists