linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/6] fs/btrfs: convert nested spin_lock_irqsave to spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0907181725320.26792@ask.diku.dk>
Date:	Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:25:53 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To:	chris.mason@...cle.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] fs/btrfs: convert nested spin_lock_irqsave to spin_lock

From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>

If spin_lock_irqsave is called twice in a row with the same second
argument, the interrupt state at the point of the second call overwrites
the value saved by the first call.  Indeed, the second call does not need
to save the interrupt state, so it is changed to a simple spin_lock.

The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression lock1,lock2;
expression flags;
@@

*spin_lock_irqsave(lock1,flags)
... when != flags
*spin_lock_irqsave(lock2,flags)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>

---
 fs/btrfs/async-thread.c             |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
index 6e4f6c5..019e8af 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
@@ -424,11 +424,11 @@ int btrfs_requeue_work(struct btrfs_work *work)
 	 * list
 	 */
 	if (worker->idle) {
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&worker->workers->lock, flags);
+		spin_lock(&worker->workers->lock);
 		worker->idle = 0;
 		list_move_tail(&worker->worker_list,
 			       &worker->workers->worker_list);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&worker->workers->lock, flags);
+		spin_unlock(&worker->workers->lock);
 	}
 	if (!worker->working) {
 		wake = 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/