linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] drivers/misc/sgi-xp: convert nested spin_lock_irqsave to spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:20:00 -0500
From:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc:	holt@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drivers/misc/sgi-xp: convert nested
	spin_lock_irqsave to spin_lock

On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 05:23:57PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> -			spin_lock_irqsave(&part_uv->flags_lock, irq_flags);
> +			spin_lock(&part_uv->flags_lock);
>  			part_uv->flags &= ~XPC_P_CACHED_ACTIVATE_GRU_MQ_DESC_UV;

Please do not change this.

I think this is a false positive to a automated script.  We are not
comparing against the processors irq flags, but rather against the
partitions flags.  Note above the difference between irq_flags and
part_uv->flags.

Maybe I misunderstand your point in this patch.

Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/