| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090717204114.GA535@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:41:14 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: mel@....ul.ie
Subject: [PATCH] Handle PXM memory hotadd regions with existing memory
Handle PXM memory hotadd regions with existing memory
Linux would previously assume that if a PXM region in SRAT
has the hotplug memory bit set the memory is only future
hotpluggable. If there was already memory in this area
it would reject it completely.
This patch changes this to deal with systems which
set the memory hotplug bit on already existing PXMs.
We simply check if there is any memory in a PXM
and if yes always handle it like a non hotpluggable
PXM.
This also removes some obsolete checks.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.31-rc3-ak/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31-rc3-ak.orig/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ linux-2.6.31-rc3-ak/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ static int num_node_memblks __initdata;
static struct bootnode node_memblk_range[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;
static int memblk_nodeid[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;
+/*
+ * Memory expected to be missing in PXMs. We lose 3 pages
+ * somewhere, so default to 1MB of slack. Unit is PFNs
+ */
+static unsigned long memory_missing __initdata = (1 << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT));
+
static __init int setup_node(int pxm)
{
return acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
@@ -172,11 +178,6 @@ acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct
pxm, apic_id, node);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE
-static inline int save_add_info(void) {return 1;}
-#else
-static inline int save_add_info(void) {return 0;}
-#endif
/*
* Update nodes_add[]
* This code supports one contiguous hot add area per node
@@ -184,8 +185,6 @@ static inline int save_add_info(void) {r
static void __init
update_nodes_add(int node, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
- unsigned long s_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- unsigned long e_pfn = end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
int changed = 0;
struct bootnode *nd = &nodes_add[node];
@@ -200,14 +199,6 @@ update_nodes_add(int node, unsigned long
return;
}
- /* This check might be a bit too strict, but I'm keeping it for now. */
- if (absent_pages_in_range(s_pfn, e_pfn) != e_pfn - s_pfn) {
- printk(KERN_ERR
- "SRAT: Hotplug area %lu -> %lu has existing memory\n",
- s_pfn, e_pfn);
- return;
- }
-
/* Looks good */
if (nd->start == nd->end) {
@@ -232,6 +223,33 @@ update_nodes_add(int node, unsigned long
nd->start, nd->end);
}
+/*
+ * PXM only contains future-pluggable memory?
+ * Side effect: Updates memory_missing.
+ */
+static int __init ma_future_pluggable(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma,
+ unsigned long start_pfn,
+ unsigned long end_pfn)
+{
+ unsigned long absent;
+
+ if (!(ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE))
+ return 0;
+
+ absent = absent_pages_in_range(start_pfn, end_pfn);
+ if (absent != end_pfn - start_pfn) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO
+ "SRAT: Hotplug area %lx-%lx has existing memory (missing %lu MB)\n",
+ start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ absent << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT));
+ memory_missing += absent;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
/* Callback for parsing of the Proximity Domain <-> Memory Area mappings */
void __init
acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma)
@@ -240,6 +258,7 @@ acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct ac
unsigned long start, end;
int node, pxm;
int i;
+ unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
if (srat_disabled())
return;
@@ -250,8 +269,6 @@ acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct ac
if ((ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_ENABLED) == 0)
return;
- if ((ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE) && !save_add_info())
- return;
start = ma->base_address;
end = start + ma->length;
pxm = ma->proximity_domain;
@@ -288,10 +305,24 @@ acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct ac
printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: Node %u PXM %u %lx-%lx\n", node, pxm,
start, end);
- e820_register_active_regions(node, start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
- end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
- if (ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE) {
+ start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ end_pfn = end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ e820_register_active_regions(node, start_pfn, end_pfn);
+
+ /*
+ * Only treat a range as future-hotplug when it contains no existing
+ * memory.
+ *
+ * We could probably split this into multiple areas in case
+ * only some memory is missing, but let's keep it simple for now.
+ * Not treating a non-existing range as hotplug only costs
+ * some memory.
+ */
+ if (ma_future_pluggable(ma, start_pfn, end_pfn)) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "PXM Node %u %lx-%lx is future hotpluggable\n",
+ node, start, end);
update_nodes_add(node, start, end);
/* restore nodes[node] */
*nd = oldnode;
@@ -323,12 +354,12 @@ static int __init nodes_cover_memory(con
}
e820ram = max_pfn - (e820_hole_size(0, max_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT)>>PAGE_SHIFT);
- /* We seem to lose 3 pages somewhere. Allow 1M of slack. */
- if ((long)(e820ram - pxmram) >= (1<<(20 - PAGE_SHIFT))) {
+ if ((long)(e820ram - pxmram) >= memory_missing) {
printk(KERN_ERR
- "SRAT: PXMs only cover %luMB of your %luMB e820 RAM. Not used.\n",
+ "SRAT: PXMs only cover %luMB of your %luMB e820 RAM (expected missing %luMB)\n",
(pxmram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20,
- (e820ram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20);
+ (e820ram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20,
+ (memory_missing << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20);
return 0;
}
return 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists