| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4A618948.9040805@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:35:20 +0200 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz@...il.com> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/8] 2.6.27.27-stable review Ozkan Sezer wrote: > You may want to review this: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/3/36 > .. and its follow-up: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/3/294 > .. and this old one (can't believe it's still there) : > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/3/463 Well, why don't /you/ review these issues? (Are these bugs which meet the criteria enumerated in Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt? Is there a fix in mainline which can be taken over as-is or in similar form for 2.6.x.y?) If the answer to both is yes, submit patches as described in stable_kernel_rules.txt. If you are not quite sure about the criteria, discuss the bugs and their fixes with the respective maintainers who should know them well enough to judge whether they are -stable material. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--= -=== =--=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists