[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090717174128.36d00972.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:41:28 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add gfp mask checking for __get_free_pages()
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 11:09:50 +0900
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
> __get_free_pages() with __GFP_HIGHMEM is not safe because the return
> address cannot represent a highmem page. get_zeroed_page() already has
> such a debug checking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index e0f2cdf..4a1a374 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1903,31 +1903,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__alloc_pages_nodemask);
> */
> unsigned long __get_free_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> {
> - struct page * page;
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + /*
> + * __get_free_pages() returns a 32-bit address, which cannot represent
> + * a highmem page
> + */
> + VM_BUG_ON((gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGHMEM) != 0);
> +
> page = alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order);
> if (!page)
> return 0;
> return (unsigned long) page_address(page);
> }
> -
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__get_free_pages);
>
> unsigned long get_zeroed_page(gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> - struct page * page;
> -
> - /*
> - * get_zeroed_page() returns a 32-bit address, which cannot represent
> - * a highmem page
> - */
> - VM_BUG_ON((gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGHMEM) != 0);
> -
> - page = alloc_pages(gfp_mask | __GFP_ZERO, 0);
> - if (page)
> - return (unsigned long) page_address(page);
> - return 0;
> + return __get_free_pages(gfp_mask | __GFP_ZERO, 0);
> }
> -
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_zeroed_page);
>
> void __pagevec_free(struct pagevec *pvec)
Fair enough.
I suspect we could just delete that VM_BUG_ON() - we can't go and do
runtime checking for every darn programmer error, and this would be a
pretty dumb one.
Your patch turns get_zeroed_page() into a simple one-liner wrapper
around __get_free_pages(). We could perhaps save some .text, some
kernel stack and some CPU cycles by inlining get_zeroed_page().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists