[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090718115556.GA31007@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:55:56 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alexey Fisher <bug-track@...her-privat.net>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext4 memory leak (was Re: [PATCH] x86: _edata should include
all .data.* sections on X86_64)
* Alexey Fisher <bug-track@...her-privat.net> wrote:
> This patch work for me.
nice. Any leftovers that might be false positives and need
annotation?
We learned this with lockdep: the moment a typical x86 distro bootup
is 'warnings free', utility of the debugging facility increases
dramatically: people can standardize on 'kmemleak should never
produce warnings' workflows and distros can also start feeding
kmemleak reports into kerneloops.org or so.
So the general direction kmemleak is moving into is really
encouraging.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists