[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A61BBC0.5070706@zytor.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 08:10:40 -0400
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add function to convert between calendar time and
broken-down time for universal use
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> I'm also wondering whether including LGPL glibc code in the kernel
> like this is license-appropriate - there seems to be few precedents
> of it. It _should_ be OK, but i've Cc:-ed involved folks just to
> make sure everyone agrees ...
>
Doesn't seem any more odd to me than BSD/GPL dual-licensing, which we
already have tons of.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists