linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] Introduce CLOCK_REALTIME

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1247986081.9351.21.camel@entropy>
Date:	Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:48:01 -0700
From:	Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	Chris Snook <chris.snook@...il.com>,
	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...x.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, nikolag@...ibm.com,
	Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Introduce CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE

On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 23:14 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> it's on x86.. likely/unlikely don't impact the CPU (since there are no
> "ignore the branch predictor" hints), only the code placement.....

But code placement does affect branch prediction (e.g. the Pentium 4
static predictor assumes backward branches are taken, recent AMD
processors prefer you to arrange code such that conditional branches are
not taken, etc.)

-- 
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/