linux-kernel - Re: How to handle >16TB devices on 32 bit hosts ??

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 19 Jul 2009 06:44:36 +0300
From:	Tapani Tarvainen <tapani@...anitarvainen.fi>
To:	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How to handle >16TB devices on 32 bit hosts ??

On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 09:48:11AM +0200, Andi Kleen (andi@...stfloor.org) wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 02:52:13AM -0400, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > If you aren't running a 32-bit system with this config, you shouldn't
> > really care.  For those systems that need to run in this mode they
> > would rather have it work a few percent slower instead of not at all.
> 
> Well, it doesn't work at all anyways due to the fsck problem.

I can imagine several scenarios where 16TB+ raid would be useful
without any filesystems bigger than 2TB.
Or does LVM have problems with 16TB+ devices in 32bit-systems, too?

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/