[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090720114720.GB9029@kryten>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:47:20 +1000
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: Always return the parent counter id to
userspace
Hi Peter,
> Please add -p to your diff args, or use
> QUILT_DIFF_OPTS="--show-c-function".
Sorry about that, I lost my .quiltrc somewhere along the line.
> > @@ -2704,8 +2718,10 @@
> > if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR)
> > perf_output_put(&handle, data->addr);
> >
> > - if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ID)
> > - perf_output_put(&handle, counter->id);
> > + if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ID) {
> > + u64 id = primary_counter_id(counter);
> > + perf_output_put(&handle, id);
> > + }
> >
> > if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CPU)
> > perf_output_put(&handle, cpu_entry);
>
> This will actually wreck things.
>
> It would be impossible to relate PERF_EVENT_PERIOD/THROTTLE (and maybe
> others) to their respective counters.
>
> If you have inherited counters and each task will have separate ones,
> you need separate IDs in their sample stream to be able to related
> PERIOD and THROTTLE events.
I think I'm missing something. I'm logging two events at once with perf record
(-e page-faults -e dTLB-load-misses) and I added PERF_SAMPLE_ID to be able to
identify each event in the output file.
I'm not seeing a way to inherit and share counters (so we always get a
consistent id which matches the perf.data header), or a way for the new
counters to be written out to the log as they are created (so I can work
back to the original id).
Anton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists