[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13548.1248093963@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:46:03 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...cali.co.uk>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb()
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> Upcoming paches to support the new 64-bit "BookE" powerpc architecture
> will need to have the virtual address corresponding to PTE page when
> freeing it, due to the way the HW table walker works.
>
> Basically, the TLB can be loaded with "large" pages that cover the whole
> virtual space (well, sort-of, half of it actually) represented by a PTE
> page, and which contain an "indirect" bit indicating that this TLB entry
> RPN points to an array of PTEs from which the TLB can then create direct
> entries. Thus, in order to invalidate those when PTE pages are deleted,
> we need the virtual address to pass to tlbilx or tlbivax instructions.
>
> The old trick of sticking it somewhere in the PTE page struct page sucks
> too much, the address is almost readily available in all call sites and
> almost everybody implemets these as macros, so we may as well add the
> argument everywhere. I added it to the pmd and pud variants for consistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> [MN10300 & FRV]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists