[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090720165941.GA15660@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:59:41 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Sam Ramji <sramji@...rosoft.com>,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/54] [Announce] Microsoft Hyper-V drivers for Linux
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:28:10AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:00:25AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm happy to announce, that after many months of discussions, Microsoft
> > has released their Hyper-V Linux drivers under the GPLv2. Following
> > this message, will be the patches that add the drivers to the
> > drivers/staging/ tree, and a whole bunch of cleanups.
>
> Hm, for some reason my scripts to send patches out caused them to get
> eaten by the very good lkml filters. (note, it was my fault, not
> lkml's).
>
> So instead of trying to send them again, and spaming everyone who
> already got them, you can find them in my staging tree at:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-05-staging/
>
> If anyone wants me to post any of the individual 54 patches to them,
> please let me know.
Given the numerous cleanup patches that already exist, is there any reason
to not just post the cleaned up drivers ? It would certainly be more
reviewable than the current pile.
Come to think of it, is there any value in merging the pre-cleaned up
patches ? Why merge 54 patches to mainline when a half dozen will do ?
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists