[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090720172748.GA27660@Krystal>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:27:48 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...uxtronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"K . Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] hw-breakpoints: Make kernel breakpoints API
truly generic
* Frederic Weisbecker (fweisbec@...il.com) wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index c1f64e6..015fec6 100644
> --- a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -297,15 +297,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_user_hw_breakpoint);
> /**
> * register_kernel_hw_breakpoint - register a hardware breakpoint for kernel space
> * @bp: the breakpoint structure to register
> - *
> - * @bp.info->name or @bp.info->address, @bp.info->len, @bp.info->type and
> + * @addr: the address where we want to set the breakpoint
> + * @len: length of the value in memory to break in
> + * @type: the type of the breakpoint (read/write/execute)
> * @bp->triggered must be set properly before invocation
Hi Frederic,
I think one of the great addition in this patchset is to allow using
breakpoints from arch-agnostic code.
It becomes important to document the error values which can be returned
by register_kernel_hw_breakpoint, so this will serve as guidelines for
architecture-specific arch_fill_hw_breakpoint() implementation. This
will become increasingly important, as this abstraction layer will
basically be responsible for either:
- Finding the best support the architecture can provide for a given hw
breakpoint.
- Failing with an explicit error value telling the in-kernel user why it
failed (e.g. if it must use a fallback, or return the error to the
user).
Maybe we should think of a more flexible breakpoint type mapping too,
e.g.:
monitor _strictly_ execute operation on address 0x...
-> would fail if the architecture does not support execution access
monitoring
monitor (at least) execute operations on address 0x...
-> would be allowed to use a more general monitor (e.g. RWX) if the
architecture does not support "execute only" monitor.
(same for read and write)
Mathieu
> *
> */
> -int register_kernel_hw_breakpoint(struct hw_breakpoint *bp)
> +int register_kernel_hw_breakpoint(struct hw_breakpoint *bp, unsigned long addr,
> + int len, enum breakpoint_type type)
> {
> int rc;
>
> + rc = arch_fill_hw_breakpoint(bp, addr, len, type);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> rc = arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(bp, NULL);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists