[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248059376.26272.311.camel@rzhang-dt>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:09:36 +0800
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] introduce the device async action mechanism
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 06:16 +0800, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >
> > that's not enough.
> > ???For examples,
> > ACPI battery and EC are independent devices, but EC must be resumed
> > before battery because battery driver may access some EC address space
> > during resume time.
>
> Yes, but those dependencies should be pulled from driver tree, not
> adding separate dependencies infrastructure.
>
Sorry, the problem I described above is wrong.
We just disable the EC interrupt mode in S3, but it still works.
Battery can access EC address space before EC resumed, in low speed.
>
> > > In particular, we have to make sure that parent devices will not be suspended
> > > until all of their children have been suspended and children devices will not
> > > be resumed before the parents.
> >
this is right.
thanks,
rui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists