| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:07:07 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <me@...ipebalbi.com>
To: balajitk@...com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com,
khilman@...prootsystems.com, david-b@...bell.net,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
sameo@...nedhand.com, wim@...ana.be, timo.t.kokkonen@...ia.com,
ben-linux@...ff.org, lrg@...mlogic.co.uk,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 irq
framework
hi,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 07:06:32PM +0530, balajitk@...com wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/irqs.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/irqs.h
> index fb7cb77..009cf4d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/irqs.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/irqs.h
> @@ -551,8 +551,20 @@
> #endif
> #define TWL4030_GPIO_IRQ_END (TWL4030_GPIO_IRQ_BASE + TWL4030_GPIO_NR_IRQS)
>
> +#define TWL6030_IRQ_BASE (OMAP_FPGA_IRQ_END)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TWL6030_CORE
> +#define TWL6030_BASE_NR_IRQS 20
> +#else
> +#define TWL6030_BASE_NR_IRQS 0
> +#endif
> +#define TWL6030_IRQ_END (TWL6030_IRQ_BASE + TWL6030_BASE_NR_IRQS)
> +
> /* Total number of interrupts depends on the enabled blocks above */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TWL4030_CORE
> #define NR_IRQS TWL4030_GPIO_IRQ_END
> +#else
> +#define NR_IRQS TWL6030_IRQ_END
> +#endif
this will be tricky to make it better. Tony ? Dave ? Any suggestions ?
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> index 4e9d513..17c533d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TPS65010) += tps65010.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MENELAUS) += menelaus.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_TWL4030_CORE) += twl-core.o twl4030-irq.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_TWL6030_CORE) += twl-core.o twl6030-irq.o
this will break multi-omap builds. Tony can comment a bit more on this,
but I suggest you try to find some way to figure out if you're running
on twl4030/twl5030 or twl6030.
Maybe one way would be to add a TWL6030 flag to twl4030-core.c, just
like we have TWL4030_VAUX2 and TPS_SUBSET. And I know of one more hw
that will fall into this driver and patches shall be coming out soonish.
So another flag should be added.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TWL6030_CORE
we have to avoid these ifdeferry.
> +#define TWL6030_MODULE_LAST TWL6030_MODULE_AUDIO
> +#define TWL_MODULE_LAST TWL6030_MODULE_LAST
> +
> +#define RTC_SUB_CHIP_ID SUB_CHIP_ID0
> +#define REG_SUB_CHIP_ID SUB_CHIP_ID0
> +#define USB_SUB_CHIP_ID SUB_CHIP_ID1
> +#define MADC_SUB_CHIP_ID SUB_CHIP_ID1
> +#define BCI_SUB_CHIP_ID SUB_CHIP_ID1
> +#define GPIO_SUB_CHIP_ID 0 /* NOT SUPPORTED IN TWL6030 */
> +#define KEYPAD_SUB_CHIP_ID 0 /* ADDED FOR COMPILATION ONLY */
maybe passing these via platform_data or using the TWL6030 flag somehow.
> +/* subchip/slave 0 0x48 - POWER */
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_RTC 0x0000
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_MEM 0x0017
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_PM_MASTER 0x001F
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_PM_SLAVE_MISC 0x0030
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_PM_SLAVE_SMPS 0x0040
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_PM_SLAVE_LDO 0x0080
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_PM_SLAVE_RES 0x00AD
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_PM_MISC 0x00E3
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_PM_PUPD 0x00F0
> +
> +/* subchip/slave 1 0x49 - FEATURE */
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_USB 0x0000
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_GPADC_CTRL 0x0030
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_GPADC_RT 0x0035
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_GPADC 0x005D
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_AUX 0x0090
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_PWM 0x00BA
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_GASGAUGE 0x00C0
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_PIH 0x00D0
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_CHARGER 0x00E0
> +
> +/* subchip/slave 2 0x4A - DFT */
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_DIEID 0x00C0
> +
> +/* subchip/slave 3 0x4B - AUDIO */
> +#define TWL6030_BASEADD_AUDIO 0x0000
> +#endif /* CONFIG_TWL6030_CORE */
> +
> /* Few power values */
> #define R_CFG_BOOT 0x05
> #define R_PROTECT_KEY 0x0E
> @@ -190,7 +231,7 @@
> /* is driver active, bound to a chip? */
> static bool inuse;
>
> -/* Structure for each TWL4030 Slave */
> +/* Structure for each TWL4030/TWL6030 Slave */
> struct twl_client {
> struct i2c_client *client;
> u8 address;
> @@ -212,7 +253,7 @@ struct twl_mapping {
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TWL4030_CORE
avoid ifdef
> -static struct twl_mapping twl4030_map[TWL4030_MODULE_LAST + 1] = {
> +static struct twl_mapping twl_map[TWL4030_MODULE_LAST + 1] = {
keep the old name
> @@ -247,12 +288,45 @@ static struct twl_mapping twl4030_map[TWL4030_MODULE_LAST + 1] = {
> };
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TWL6030_CORE
avoid this
> +static struct twl_mapping twl_map[TWL6030_MODULE_LAST + 1] = {
call this oe twl6030_map, the you could use TWL6030 flag to choose which
one to use.
> /**
> - * twl_i2c_write - Writes a n bit register in TWL4030
> + * twl_i2c_write - Writes a n bit register in TWL4030/TWL6030
TWL4030/TWL5030/TPS65920/TPS65930/TWL6030/...
this will only grow and grow.
> @@ -274,7 +348,7 @@ int twl_i2c_write(u8 mod_no, u8 *value, u8 reg, unsigned num_bytes)
> pr_err("%s: invalid module number %d\n", DRIVER_NAME, mod_no);
> return -EPERM;
> }
> - sid = twl4030_map[mod_no].sid;
> + sid = twl_map[mod_no].sid;
you could have something like:
if (twl_features & TWL6030)
sid = twl6030_map[mod_no].sid;
else
sid = twl4030_map[mod_no].sid;
something like that.
> @@ -292,7 +366,7 @@ int twl_i2c_write(u8 mod_no, u8 *value, u8 reg, unsigned num_bytes)
> msg->flags = 0;
> msg->buf = value;
> /* over write the first byte of buffer with the register address */
> - *value = twl4030_map[mod_no].base + reg;
> + *value = twl_map[mod_no].base + reg;
ditto
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists