[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090720045037.GA24157@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:20:37 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk,
aarcange@...hat.com, chrisw@...hat.com, avi@...hat.com,
riel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] ksm: change ksm nice level to be 5
* Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com> [2009-07-17 20:30:50]:
> From: Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>
>
> ksm should try not to disturb other tasks as much as possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>
> ---
> mm/ksm.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> index 75d7802..4afe345 100644
> --- a/mm/ksm.c
> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
> @@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@ static void ksm_do_scan(unsigned int scan_npages)
>
> static int ksm_scan_thread(void *nothing)
> {
> - set_user_nice(current, 0);
> + set_user_nice(current, 5);
Is the 5 arbitrary? Why not +19? What is the intention of this change
- to run when no other task is ready to run?
>
> while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> if (ksm_run & KSM_RUN_MERGE) {
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists