linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:48:18 +0200
From:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...cali.co.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to
 [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb()

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:11:13 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 15:56 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > I would like to merge the new support that depends on this in 2.6.32,
> > > so unless there's major objections, I'd like this to go in early during
> > > the merge window. We can sort out separately how to carry the patch
> > > around in -next until then since the powerpc tree will have a dependency
> > > on it.
> > 
> > Can't see any problem with that.
> 
> CC'ing Linus here. How do you want to proceed with that merge ? (IE. so
> far nobody objected to the patch itself)
> 
> IE. The patch affects all archs, though it's a trivial change every
> time, but I'll have stuff in powerpc-next that depends on it, and so I'm
> not sure what the right approach is here. Should I put it in the powerpc
> tree ?
> 
> I also didn't have any formal Ack from anybody, neither mm folks nor
> arch maintainers :-)

Well the change is trivial, it just adds another unused argument to the
macros. For the records: it still compiles on s390.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/