[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248083961.30899.5.camel@pasglop>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:59:21 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...cali.co.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to
[__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb()
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 10:05 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> Unless anybody has other preferences, just send it straight to Linus in
> the next merge window -- if any conflicts did come up anyway they would
> be trivial. You could just check against linux-next before doing so, and
> should see if it is going to cause problems for any arch pull...
Well, the problem is that powerpc-next will need that patch, which means
that if I don't put it in my tree, Steven won't be able to build
powerpc-next as part of linux-next until the patch is merged. Hence my
question, what's the best way to handle that :-) There isn't an mm-next
is there ? If there was, I could tell Steven to always pull powerpc
after mm for example. Or I can put it in a git tree of its own with a
dependency for Steven to pull.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists