[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248171979-29166-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:26:00 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, davem@...emloft.net,
dhowells@...hat.com, npiggin@...e.de, JBeulich@...ell.com,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, x86@...nel.org,
andi@...stfloor.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/20] percpu: fix pcpu_reclaim() locking
pcpu_reclaim() calls pcpu_depopulate_chunk() which makes use of pages
array and bitmap returned by pcpu_get_pages_and_bitmap() and thus
should be called under pcpu_alloc_mutex. pcpu_reclaim() released the
mutex before calling depopulate leading to double free and other
strange problems caused by the unexpected concurrent usages of pages
array and bitmap. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
mm/percpu.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index f993dc8..c44a5b2 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -1181,12 +1181,13 @@ static void pcpu_reclaim(struct work_struct *work)
}
spin_unlock_irq(&pcpu_lock);
- mutex_unlock(&pcpu_alloc_mutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(chunk, next, &todo, list) {
pcpu_depopulate_chunk(chunk, 0, pcpu_unit_size);
free_pcpu_chunk(chunk);
}
+
+ mutex_unlock(&pcpu_alloc_mutex);
}
/**
--
1.6.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists