[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090721161023.7607ea7f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:10:23 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "Gurudatt, Sreenidhi B" <sreenidhi.b.gurudatt@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: x86: IPC driver patch for Intel Moorestown platform
> 1. built-in code adds platform-device for mrst_ipc
> 2. user space auto-loads the mrst_ipc driver
> 3. mrst_ipc driver creates child devices for each of its attached
> devices
The devices talking to it already are devices - but they will be input
devices, watchdogs, etc. They already belong in existing classes.
I also don't believe the mrst ipc is enumerable either. If it was
enumerable it would make a lot more sense.
Having the mrst a platform device which itself contains the hardcoded
magic addresses definitely sounds a good move.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists