linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] flexible array implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:57:50 +0200
From:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	bblum@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, menage@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] flexible array implementation

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Dave Hansen<dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> +static inline struct flex_array_part *
> +__fa_get_part(struct flex_array *fa, int part_nr, gfp_t flags)
> +{
> +       struct flex_array_part *part = NULL;
> +       if (part_nr > __nr_part_ptrs())
> +               return NULL;
> +       part = fa->parts[part_nr];
> +       if (!part) {
> +               part = kmalloc(FLEX_ARRAY_PART_SIZE, flags);
> +               if (!part)
> +                       return NULL;
> +               fa->parts[part_nr] = part;
> +       }
> +       return part;
> +}

This is far too big to be an inline.

--
vda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/