[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A65FCB2.6080903@candelatech.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:36:50 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Error mounting FC8 NFS server with 2.6.31-rc3 NFSv4 client.
On 07/21/2009 10:12 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 09:49 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 07/21/2009 05:15 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>
>>> What does /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery look like on the server?
>> The server was misconfigured, but I still think the client should
>> behave better in this case. If you cannot reproduce it, let me know
>> and I can try to be more specific. If you still want the v4recovery
>> information, let me know and I'll send it.
>
> So how should the client behave, when a screwed up server allows it to
> mount but starts returning illegal values for setclientid? The only
> thing I can see we could do is to tell the user EINSANESERVER...
Well, it could just fail the mount and give up and not overly spam
/var/log/messages in a tight loop perhaps?
> Now, we _should_ fix the wretched NFS server so that it doesn't do NFSv4
> mounts when there is no configured root partition. We _should_ also fix
> the damned thing so that it doesn't return illegal values.
Sounds fine to me.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists