[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A660101.3000307@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:55:13 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
CC: Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk, chrisw@...hat.com, avi@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] ksm: identify PageKsm pages
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>> +static inline void page_add_ksm_rmap(struct page *page)
>> +{
>> + if (atomic_inc_and_test(&page->_mapcount)) {
>> + page->mapping = (void *) PAGE_MAPPING_ANON;
>> + __inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_ANON_PAGES);
>> + }
>> +}
>
> Is it correct to account them as anon pages?
Yes, but ...
>> - if (PageAnon(old_page)) {
>> + if (PageAnon(old_page) && !PageKsm(old_page)) {
>> if (!trylock_page(old_page)) {
>> page_cache_get(old_page);
>> pte_unmap_unlock(page_table, ptl);
>
> What exactly does it buy to have PageAnon return 1 on ksm pages,
> besides requiring the above additional check (that if we stick to the
> above code, I would find safer to move inside reuse_swap_page).
I guess that if they are to remain unswappable, they
should go onto the unevictable list.
Then again, I'm guessing this is all about to change
in not too much time :)
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists