[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090721185509.GA31923@console-pimps.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:55:09 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: "A, Raghu" <raghu.a@...com>
Cc: "pierre@...man.eu" <pierre@...man.eu>,
"dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net" <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Dasgupta, Romit" <romit@...com>
Subject: Re: Restoring back the system state from MMC after a successful
hibernation
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 07:35:55PM +0530, A, Raghu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying a hibernate-restore procedure on my system, wherein I store the context image on a swap partition on a MMC device (/dev/mmcblk0). The hibernation process happens smoothly. However, when I try to restore back, after including "resume = /dev/mmcblk0" in the bootargs, I find that the MMC card does not get detected by the time late_initcall(software_resume) is called, as a result of which the restore does not happen.
>
> To resolve the problem, I have included a mmc_flush_scheduled_work() call immediately after the mmc_detect_change(host, 0) call in mmc_start_host(struct mmc_host *host) function defined in linux/drivers/mmc/core/core.c, so that instead of mmc_rescan happening sometime later, it now happens right away, and the MMC card gets detected at the end of the host's .probe() callback itself.
>
> /*****
>
> void mmc_start_host(struct mmc_host *host)
>
> {
> mmc_power_off(host);
> mmc_detect_change(host, 0);
> mmc_flush_scheduled_work();
> }
>
> The host's probe() routine calls mmc_add_host , which in turn calls mmc_start_host.
>
> *****/
>
> Is this approach correct? Or is there any other way I can get the MMC card detected before late_initcall(software_resume) happens?
>
I think this is a good idea. Based on the comment for mmc_add_host(), by
the time we've exited mmc_add_host() the host should be ready to start
servicing requests, so mmc_start_host() really needs to have the
detected the card by the time it returns.
Perhaps it would be a good idea for mmc_detect_change() to grow another
argument that allows the detection to be synchronous?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists