[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1ocrdn0hx.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:18:34 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Brayan Arraes <brayan@...k.com.br>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysrq, kdump: fix regression, revert "simplify sysrq-c handler"
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> writes:
> Even I agreed your fix, I don't agreed your naming,
> For your fix, the correct naming should be:
>
> .help_msg = "oops(C)",
> .action_msg = "Trigger an oops"
>
> And document it:
> Sysrq-c always causes an oops by an indirect way. It'll do one of 4 things:
> 1) panic_on_oops=0, it is just kill the current task.
> 2) panic_on_oops=1, but CONFIG_KEXEC=n, just normal panic
> 3) panic_on_oops=1, CONFIG_KEXEC=y, but not enabled, just normal panic
> 4) panic_on_oops=1, CONFIG_KEXEC=y, kdump was enabled, CrashDump.
That sounds like a great way to sort out the understanding.
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Could you turn that into a proper patch?
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists