[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <EAF47CD23C76F840A9E7FCE10091EFAB02B59503D1@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:03:53 +0530
From: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To: "me@...ipebalbi.com" <me@...ipebalbi.com>
CC: "Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T" <balajitk@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"khilman@...prootsystems.com" <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
"david-b@...bell.net" <david-b@...bell.net>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"sameo@...nedhand.com" <sameo@...nedhand.com>,
"wim@...ana.be" <wim@...ana.be>,
"timo.t.kokkonen@...ia.com" <timo.t.kokkonen@...ia.com>,
"ben-linux@...ff.org" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
"lrg@...mlogic.co.uk" <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: OMAP: Rename twl4030* driver files to enable
re-use
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:me@...ipebalbi.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:55 AM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh
> Cc: me@...ipebalbi.com; Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; tony@...mide.com;
> khilman@...prootsystems.com; david-b@...bell.net;
> linux-omap@...r.kernel.org; linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org;
> sameo@...nedhand.com; wim@...ana.be;
> timo.t.kokkonen@...ia.com; ben-linux@...ff.org;
> lrg@...mlogic.co.uk; broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com;
> Nayak, Rajendra
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: OMAP: Rename twl4030* driver
> files to enable re-use
>
> hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:01:06AM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> > > So IMO, renaming the files is unnecessary.
> > Well tps* are just catalog names of the twl4* family. So
> you can keep adding whatever names there as long it's a same IC.
> >
> > Perhaps you look in hurry to comment about this. Please
> look at the intention of these patches. TWL6030 has PM IC
> similar to TWL4030 with bit different interrupt management.
> Audio IC is a separate one as compared to combined in case of TWL4030.
> >
> > If it allows code re-use by renaming files, it should be
> good. Isn't it ?
>
> What I'm trying to say is you can re-use the code even
> without renaming
> those files, just add twl6030-irq and use some sort of
> runtime check to
> use one or other irq mechanism.
We initially tried this but code is becoming ugly and not at all
readable. In fact this was a short cut and would have saved
us some time :)
By renaming, we thought it can become a generic for further versions
of TWL IC's and adding support to those would be cleaner.
Let's get feedback from more people on the list
Regards,
Santosh--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists