[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0907211759180.19335@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Troy Moure <twmoure@...pr.net>
cc: Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, stable@...nel.org,
lwn@....net, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.27.27
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Just out of curiosity, how did you find it? Now that I know where to look,
> it's very obvious in the assembler diffs, but I didn't notice it until you
> pointed it out just because there is so _much_ of the diffs...
Ahh. I think I see how you found it. Looking at the diffs, there's only a
few places where the number of instructions changed by a big fraction. And
there's only _one_ place that has a factor-of-three difference (26 lines
in the correct cases, and 7 lines in the wrong one). Clever.
There's also a case in do_page_fault() where -fno-strict-overflow
generates a _lot_ more instructions than the other cases (but not by a
factor of three - but it expands 63 instructions to 100). I'm not seeing
quite _why_ it does that, but it does various stupid things like multiply
by 0x38 etc. But it doesn't look buggy, it just looks stupid.
Or did you just brute-force it and spend a lot of time eyeballing things?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists