[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090722095818.GH6281@cr0.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:58:18 +0800
From: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Move generated files to include/generated
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:10:40PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>In 2.6.30 we introduced support for adding generated
>files to a dedicated directory named "include/generated".
>
Personally, I don't like this, I hate to see
#include <generated/foo.h>
.
>This had a number of benefits:
>
> - avoid mixing generated and normal files
I don't think this is an advantage...
> - allow us to finally kill the asm symlink
This makes sense, but it looks like only when 'make O=xxx',
no?
> - simpler .gitignore rules
> - simpler list of mrproper files
Neither these two.
The benifits we get is little, I think.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists