[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248267830.27058.1404.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:03:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: tom.leiming@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [tip:core/locking 2/3] lockdep:define preallocated "stack" for
BFS as per cpu variable
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 20:58 +0800, tom.leiming@...il.com wrote:
> From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
This patch can use a changelog.
Why is this needed, isn't all that serialized by the graph_lock anyway?
Or are there a few paths where this isn't the case and we're now racy?
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/lockdep.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
> index 1b1796a..1583439 100644
> --- a/kernel/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
> @@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ struct circular_queue {
> unsigned int front, rear;
> };
>
> -static struct circular_queue lock_cq;
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct circular_queue, lock_cq);
>
> unsigned int max_bfs_queue_depth;
>
> @@ -937,7 +937,7 @@ static int __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry,
> {
> struct lock_list *entry;
> struct list_head *head;
> - struct circular_queue *cq = &lock_cq;
> + struct circular_queue *cq = &get_cpu_var(lock_cq);
> int ret = 1;
>
> if (match(source_entry, data)) {
> @@ -993,6 +993,7 @@ static int __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry,
> }
> }
> exit:
> + put_cpu_var(lock_cq);
> return ret;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists