[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A6764E0.7080302@shipmail.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:13:36 +0200
From: Thomas Hellström <thomas@...pmail.org>
To: Jerome Glisse <glisse@...edesktop.org>
CC: Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: TTM page pool allocator
Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 15:16 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 21:22 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 20:00 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 19:34 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:53 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 4) We could now skip the ttm_tt_populate() in ttm_tt_set_caching, since
>>>>>> it will always allocate cached pages and then transition them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Okay 4) is bad, what happens (my brain is a bit meltdown so i might be
>>>>> wrong) :
>>>>> 1 - bo get allocated tt->state = unpopulated
>>>>> 2 - bo is mapped few page are faulted tt->state = unpopulated
>>>>> 3 - bo is cache transitioned but tt->state == unpopulated but
>>>>> they are page which have been touch by the cpu so we need
>>>>> to clflush them and transition them, this never happen if
>>>>> we don't call ttm_tt_populate and proceed with the remaining
>>>>> of the cache transitioning functions
>>>>>
>>>>> As a workaround i will try to go through the pages tables and
>>>>> transition existing pages. Do you have any idea for a better
>>>>> plan ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Jerome
>>>>>
>>>> My workaround ruin the whole idea of pool allocation what happens
>>>> is that most bo get cache transition page per page. My thinking
>>>> is that we should do the following:
>>>> - is there is a least one page allocated then fully populate
>>>> the object and do cache transition on all the pages.
>>>> - otherwise update caching_state and leaves object unpopulated
>>>>
>>>> This needs that we some how reflect the fact that there is at least
>>>> one page allocated, i am thinking to adding a new state for that :
>>>> ttm_partialy_populated
>>>>
>>>> Thomas what do you think about that ?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Jerome
>>>>
>>> Attached updated patch it doesn't introduce ttm_partialy_populated
>>> but keep the populate call in cache transition. So far it seems to
>>> work properly on AGP platform
>>>
>> Yeah, this one works for me as well.
>>
>>
>>> and helps quite a lot with performances.
>>>
>> Can't say I've noticed that however. How did you measure?
>>
>
> gears
Hmm,
In gears there shouldn't really be any buffer allocation / freeing going
on at all once the display lists are set up, and gears should really be
gpu bound in most cases.
what's the source of the buffer allocations / frees when gears is run?
/Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists