linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/2] move binfmt filed to signal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090722132302.a9889eb3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:23:02 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] move binfmt filed to signal_struct

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:42:31 +0900
Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com> wrote:

> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
> 
> Because the binfmt is not different between threads in the same process,
> it can be moved from task_struct to signal_struct.
> 

Seems like a logical cleanup to me.

We should rename signal_struct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/