[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A67A1D1.8040201@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:33:37 -0300
From: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] genirq fixes for 2.6.31
Kevin Winchester wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> +/*
>> * Interrupt handler thread
>> */
>> static int irq_thread(void *data)
>> @@ -458,6 +494,8 @@ static int irq_thread(void *data)
>>
>> while (!irq_wait_for_interrupt(action)) {
>>
>> + irq_thread_check_affinity(desc, action);
>> +
>> atomic_inc(&desc->threads_active);
>>
>> spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
>
> Any chance we could do this in a way that doesn't break the build for CONFIG_SMP=n? :)
>
> Should this call simply be wrapped in an #ifdef, or should the function be defined for !SMP?
>
Actually, I guess the function is defined always, but it references desc->affinity unconditionally.
Perhaps something like the following (likely whitespace damaged) patch:
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index f0de36f..353e335 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -451,6 +451,8 @@ static int irq_wait_for_interrupt(struct irqaction *action)
return -1;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+
/*
* Check whether we need to change the affinity of the interrupt thread.
*/
@@ -479,6 +481,15 @@ irq_thread_check_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
free_cpumask_var(mask);
}
+#else
+
+static void
+irq_thread_check_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
+{
+}
+
+#endif
+
/*
* Interrupt handler thread
*/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists