[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090722174741.79743e3a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:47:41 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, npiggin@...e.de,
hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk, avi@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, aarcange@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ZERO PAGE again v4.
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:33:34 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> BTW, when I post new version, should I send a reply to old version to say
> "this version is obsolete" ? Can it make your work easier ? like following.
>
> Re:[PATCH][Obsolete] new version weill come (Was.....)
>
> I tend to update patches until v5 or more until merged.
Usually it's pretty clear when a new patch or patch series is going to
be sent. I think that simply resending it all is OK.
I don't pay much attention to the "version N" info either - it can be
unreliable and not everyone does it and chronological ordering works OK
for this.
Very occasionally I'll merge a patch and then discover a later version
further down through the backlog. But that's OK - I'll just update the
patch. Plus I'm not usually stuck this far in the past.
(I'm still trying to find half a day to read "Per-bdi writeback flusher
threads v12")
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists