[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090723131250.GA9535@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:12:50 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: Oren Laadan <orenl@...rato.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC v17][PATCH 22/60] c/r: external checkpoint of a task
other than ourself
Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@...rato.com):
>
>
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@...rato.com):
> >> Now we can do "external" checkpoint, i.e. act on another task.
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> long do_checkpoint(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx, pid_t pid)
> >> {
> >> long ret;
> >>
> >> + ret = init_checkpoint_ctx(ctx, pid);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + if (ctx->root_freezer) {
> >> + ret = cgroup_freezer_begin_checkpoint(ctx->root_freezer);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >
> > Self-checkpoint of a task in root freezer is now denied, though.
> >
> > Was that intentional?
>
> Yes.
>
> "root freezer" is an arbitrary task in the checkpoint subtree or
> container. It is used to verify that all checkpointed tasks - except
> for current, if doing self-checkpoint - belong to the same freezer
> group.
>
> Since current is busy calling checkpoint(2), and since we only permit
> checkpoint of (cgroup-) frozen tasks, then - by definition - it cannot
> possibly belong to the same group. If it did, it would itself be frozen
> like its fellows and unable to call checkpoint(2).
So then you're saying that regular self-checkpoint no longer works,
but the documentation still shows self.c and claims it should just
work.
Mind you I prefer this as it is more consistent, but I thought it
was something you wanted to support.
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists