| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:57:51 -0700 From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.31-rc4: strange change in iomem allocation On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:42:28 -0700 Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Frans Pop<elendil@...net.nl> wrote: > > I'm seeing the following change in dmesg between -rc3 and -rc4: > > -system 00:0c: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xfec000ff has been reserved > > +system 00:0c: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xfec000ff could not be > > reserved > > > > There is nothing in the earlier part of dmesg that would explain > > this change. > > > > The change is also visible in /proc/iomem: > > fec00000-fec00fff : IOAPIC 0 > > fec00000-fec00fff : reserved > > - fec00000-fec000ff : pnp 00:0c > > > > I somewhat suspect 857fdc53a0a90c3ba7fcf5b1fb4c7a62ae03cf82: > > x86/pci: insert ioapic resource before assigning unassigned > > resources > > > > System is HP 2510p notebook (x86_64). > > should be ok. we don't need that > fec00000-fec000ff : pnp 00:0c So the PNP ranges are duplicating the IOAPIC range? Seems harmless enough... -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists