[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20907231013k3d5e8c89w1069e8509539438f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:13:31 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: maciej.sosnowski@...el.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, patrice.vilchez@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: at_hdmac: add DMA slave transfers
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Nicolas Ferre<nicolas.ferre@...el.com> wrote:
> This patch for at_hdmac adds the slave transfers capability to the Atmel DMA
> controller available on some AT91 SOCs. This allow peripheral to memory and
> memory to peripheral transfers with hardware handshaking.
>
> Slave structure for controller specific information is passed through channel
> private data. This at_dma_slave structure is defined in at_hdmac.h header file
> and relative hardware definition are moved to this file from at_hdmac_regs.h.
> Doing this we allow the channel configuration from platform definition code.
>
> This work is intensively based on dw_dmac and several slave implementations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> ---
Seems straightforward and self contained, applied. Just curious which
drivers will take advantage of this slave capability? As it stands I
do not see any in-tree users of at_hdmac beyond dmatest?
Thanks,
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists