[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A67B87C.5030104@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:10:20 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
CC: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brayan Arraes <brayan@...k.com.br>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ken'ichi Ohmichi" <oomichi@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysrq, kdump: fix regression, revert "simplify sysrq-c
handler"
Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 09:42:11AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> Can't we just set panic_on_oops = 1 in sysrq_handle_crash()? This will
>> make sure that we test oops path as well as have consistent behavior
>> between two methods of sysrc-c invocation.
>>
> Thats a good point too, seems simpler than the other approach.
OK, I'll take this way. Please wait for a moment for a patch.
Thanks,
H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists