| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:51:14 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>, Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>, linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, Stephen Chen <Stephen.Chen@...eros.com> Subject: Re: Generic events for wake up from S1-S4 On Thu 2009-07-23 16:45:22, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Note that the "why" is unreliable by design. Network driver will > > > > ignore WoL during run-time, right? > > > > > > "Why" is unrealible? I don't follow your reasoning. It should be as > > > reliable as "who"... > > > > See above. The wakeup events race with each other. > > We deliver them all. It is that simple. The rest is up to userspace. Ok, but then we should not be talking about wake up events, but... events. Like "lid opened", "wake packet came", ... . And deliver them even when they happen during run-time. That's okay with me. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists